GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-05 > 1147969794
From: "Lowe DNA" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Rethinking Non-Surname Matches.
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 11:30:12 -0500
We discussed this earlier and a list member noted that
if we found a match at 37 markers they would necessarily
be in the same sub-clade
Your Birnbach-Webb example demonstrates the importance of SNP testing
to identify the sub-clade even with close 37 marker matches.
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 11:17 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Rethinking Non-Surname Matches
at 37 markers or more, I do not ever dismiss a non-surname match. BUT I
would also say that I would recommend deep SNP testing. Again, I would
attention to the 34/37 then 44/48 match between BIRNBACH and WEBB. Turned
be in different sub-clades of R1b.
Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
|RE: [DNA] Rethinking Non-Surname Matches. by "Lowe DNA" <>|