GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-07 > 1151780790


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 67 marker results for I1b2a (was No 67-marker info for any E3b's or G's yet?)
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2006 13:06:30 -0600
References: <E1FwkYv-000M3Q-Va@mk-webmail-1.b2b.uk.tiscali.com>


What is the ISOGG list? Never heard about it or their "postings"?

Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] 67 marker results for I1b2a (was No 67-marker info for
any E3b's or G's yet?)


> Ken
> I've only seen what was posted on this and the other lists or is available
> on the various project pages at FTDNA.
> The result from the Talley project was posted on the ISOGG list - do you
> receive the ISOGG postings?
> Where can I see the I1b1 (Dinaric) results?
> There is a calibration issue between the FTDNA and EA results for DYS481.
> It's odd because the HUGO reference sequence is just a straight 22 repeats
> of three bases CTT, there's no obvious reason why 4 bases should be a
> point of disagreement as with other markers where there are separate
> invariant and variable sections. Perhaps the reference sequence is
> atypical?
> Gareth
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006 5:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNA] 67 marker results for I1b2a (was No 67-marker info for
> any E3b's or G's yet?)
>
>> How do you find these results? It's good to have an (old) I1c = I1b2a
>> Anyway, my DYS481 data in haplogroup I does not seem in line with what
>> you indicate? I have modal 23 for old I1(x) = I1b2 and modal 29 for
>> Dinaric (old) I1b = I1b1 I hope there is not another calibration issue?
>> Ken From: <>
>> > see the results for customer 30609 in the following project
>> > http://www.familytreedna.com/public/Talley-Tally/index.aspx
>> > The only DYS450=9 I have noted so far.
>> > Also has a 26 for DYS481 which is comparable with "high" (25+) values
>> > for I1a but contrasts with 23 for I1b*.
>> > DYS481 also looks like being a tell-tale marker for M222+ - typically 3
>> > or 4 repeats higher than modal R1b1c (FTDNA 25 versus 22, EA/y-match
>> > 21/22 vs 18).
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>
>


This thread: