Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-08 > 1155504483

From: John Cartmell <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] From 34/37 to 42/67
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:28:03 +0100
References: <002201c6bd5f$1dfa3f00$6401a8c0@HP> <002c01c6bd71$4e346ad0$0c139a8e@PeterAKincaid> <> <002a01c6bee9$d034daa0$01129a8e@PeterAKincaid> <023501c6beed$2e1d0c20$1b02a8c0@DC51YP91> <003901c6bef9$a2cc25e0$01129a8e@PeterAKincaid>
In-Reply-To: <003901c6bef9$a2cc25e0$01129a8e@PeterAKincaid>

On 13 Aug, Peter A. Kincaid <> wrote:
> No problem on my part as I have no wish to engage in this type of dialogue
> but when pushed I do tend to respond in kind. All in all, your find was
> very much appreciated as while comfort is sought it is always good not to
> be complacent.

I'm not sure what 'type of dialogue' is meant. There seemed to be a 'we are
all doomed' response to a single piece of information that simply wasn't
called for. I merely pointed out that such a response wasn't appropriate - and
even an 'oops!' response was some way down the line. If you think I'm being
robust you have been living in very sheltered circles! ;-)

Absolutely no malice intended at *any* point - just a touch of 'calm down!'.

John Cartmelljohn@ followed by 0845 006 8822
Qercus magazineFAX +44 (0)
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing

This thread: