GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-08 > 1156200452


From: "John Ozment" <>
Subject: Wells vs. Ozment: 41 / 43 (addtl. info.)
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:47:32 -0700


FOR ORIN WELLS --

Relative Genetics
Ozment 43/43 100.00 (It says 42/42, but that can't be.)

We tested about 9 folks among 5 branchlines at FTDNA.
(I tested three others within mine.
A second man tested a second relative within his.)

I have one mutation: DYS439=11 instead of 12
(which began with my grandfather)
A third man had one fast-moving mutation in
the 3rd panel.

APART FROM THAT, we all match up back to
1740 (probably even to 1680, his grandfather)
on 37 markers.

(Bedfordshire?) to London to Maryland
to NC to TN to AR to CA)

----------

Because of my mutation, it might actually be
40 / 43 instead of 41 / 43, etc.

RG --

Wells, Welles, Wels, deWelles, Welz, Wills --

Robert Myron Wells 41/43 95.34
Jack Thornley Wells 40/43 93.02
Thomas Wilmer Wells 40/43 93.02
Dorris Wayne Wells 36/39 92.3
Robert Lynn Wells 35/38 92.1
Don Bowman Wells 26/27 96.29
Donald Orlan Wells 24/26 92.3
Jeffery E. Wells 24/26 92.3
Robert Hewitson Wells 24/27 88.88
David Leonard Wells 24/27 88.88
Thomas Edward Wells 24/27 88.88
Michael Earl Wells 23/26 88.46
Anonymous Welling/Wellings 23/26 88.46



This thread: