GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-11 > 1163476290


From: Rebekah <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Conference [recLOH]
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:51:30 -0600
References: <539.c7d7c43.32821267@aol.com> <455744E3.8030506@earthlink.net> <REME20061113210621@alum.mit.edu> <45593B29.5080108@sbcglobal.net><45593CB3.8090604@mchsi.com>
In-Reply-To: <45593CB3.8090604@mchsi.com>


Then again, depending on the lab, it could be DYS464 = 15-15-17-18 and
15-15-15-N. Hum.>:-)


Rebekah wrote:
> Yes, it looks on the surface like one 15 was copied over a 17 and the
> other over an 18 then the 9 was copied over the 10 but I am sure that it
> is not that simple. Maybe the 9-9 was the starting position and 9-10 is
> a mutation. Would having the DYS464 markers retested by the Houston Lab
> add additional information?
--
Regards,
Rebekah


"And they wonder why the maples
Can't be happy in their shade." Trees (Neil Peart from Rush)

This thread: