GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-11 > 1164673483


From: (John Chandler)
Subject: Re: [DNA] Incorrect test results in SMGF data base
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 19:24:43 -0500 (EST)
References: <380-2200611127205552371@earthlink.net> <456B6A55.5030300@jps.net><REME20061127184216@alum.mit.edu> <456B7D45.6070504@jps.net>
In-Reply-To: <456B7D45.6070504@jps.net> (message from Marleen Van Horne onMon, 27 Nov 2006 16:05:25 -0800)


Marwleen wrote:
> As I was writing the message, it occurred to me that I might have gotten
> the wrong convention, so I went to the site and checked the numbers
> against the appropriate markers. No, I did not get the convention mixed
> up. When you look him up by surname, you get a different set of numbers
> than when you search by a set of test results.

If you bookmark the search-by-haplotype, you can encapsulate all the
details in a reproducible manner. I'd really like to see the symptoms
of failure at first hand, since I've collected quite a few haplotypes
from SMGF.

John Chandler


This thread: