GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-02 > 1171311765


From: "Elizabeth O'Donoghue" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 3 DIFFERENCES OUT OF 67 MARKERS -Significance?
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:22:45 -0000
In-Reply-To: <KHEKIJEABJGJEKDPFEDMMEKADDAA.elizabethod@eircom.net>


List, I just realized I expressed the comment below badly - I should have
said...just a single mutation or one at each DYS? Sorry. E

-----Original Message-----
From: Elizabeth O'Donoghue [mailto:]
Sent: 12 February 2007 20:07
To:
Subject: RE: [DNA] 3 DIFFERENCES OUT OF 67 MARKERS -Significance?


Thanks to those on and off list who helped me better understand the
behaviour of DYS on palindromes. I share Peter's curiosity, and would like
to clarify that the difference between the AMH and the Irish Type III at
these three markers as indicated below is just a single mutation?

459a,b464a,b,c,dCDYa,b

AMH 9,1015,15,17,1737,38
Irish Type III 8,913,13,15,1736,38

Elizabeth

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:]On Behalf Of Peter A. Kincaid
Sent: 10 February 2007 02:36
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] 3 DIFFERENCES OUT OF 67 MARKERS -Significance?


Any thoughts on whether DYS 459 causes the
most instability on the palindrome. We have
19 participants in the main group of Kincaids
with a 9,9 at 459a,b and 12 of them (abt 63%)
also have mutations at either 464 or CDY.

Best wishes!

Peter

>> On 09 February 2007 04:49 (Irish time), Vincent Vizachero wrote
>>
>> this one is a more expansive RecLOH event affecting DYS459, DYS464, and
>> CDY but still counts as a single mutation.


This thread: