GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-03 > 1172779194


From: "Jackson Montgomery-Devoni" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Challenge to YDNA J Gurus
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 14:59:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <002901c75c3b$9493f9a0$6400a8c0@Ken1>


No I am not saying that any 43 marker modal haplotypes have yet been
determined in haplogroup J. I was just wondering if 43 marker haplotypes
should also be included as they also have some insightful markers in them
and they are also a large panel of markers.



Jackson

>From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
>Reply-To:
>To: <>
>Subject: Re: [DNA] Challenge to YDNA J Gurus
>Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 12:55:36 -0700
>
>
> >
> > It is important that GDs between genuine modal haplotypes for clades or
> > varieties within J be used, not individual haplotypes. Should I read
> > something between the lines in you mentioning "43 markers"? That's a
> > count for the SMGF-connected markers. Are you saying that the 43 marker
> > modal haplotypes for clades in J have been determined? My only
> > reservation would be in that case that the fast markers have not been
> > excluded. But it could be a way to start if that's what is available.
>
>Ken

_________________________________________________________________
http://local.live.com/default.aspx?v=2&cp=43.658648~-79.383962&style=r&lvl=15&tilt=-90&dir=0&alt=-1000&scene=3702663&cid=7ABE80D1746919B4!1329

This thread: