GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-03 > 1174362284


From: "Steven Bird" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Cruciani 2007 dating method and the demic diffusion modelof E3b and J2
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 23:44:44 -0400
In-Reply-To: <45FE9CA9.8060903@sbcglobal.net>


Also perhaps for GATA-A10? I noticed that my cousin's SMGF derived values
were +2 on both markers from the values given by Cruciani for 461 and GATA
A10 for V-13. If this adjustment is made, our combined E3b1a2 profile is an
exact match for one of the samples found in Macedonia (that is, FYROM).
This is the third data collection that has provided a match to a sample in
Macedonia, the other two being YHRD and the Pericic data set from her 2005
paper on the Balkans.

Steve

>
>I don't know if this is relevant, but I noticed that in Supplementary
>Table 3 the DYS461 values appear too low by a count of 2. It appears
>that the values given for DYS461 are really A7.2 values (which need to
>be adjusted upward by a count of 2 to equal the DYS461 definition (Bosch
>et. al. (2002), Forensic Science International 125 (2002) 42-51)). I
>don't think "allele length" is a factor, but I though I would add this
>comment in ...
>Al
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Live Search Maps find all the local information you need, right when you
need it. http://maps.live.com/?icid=hmtag2&FORM=MGAC01

This thread: