GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-04 > 1176479134


From: "Alfred A. Aburto Jr." <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Cohen does not equal CMH,CMH does not equal Cohen -- only in J1 do they coincide
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:45:34 -0700
References: <461F9F20.9010003@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <461F9F20.9010003@comcast.net>


Bonnie,

> Bonnie Schrack wrote:

>I feel really tired of this debate, which seems to be never-ending, no
>matter how many times it's discussed clearly -- baseless assertions are
>brought up over and over. But it looks as though I had better try
>again, since my name gets dragged into it. :-( It seems to be my
>responsibility, since as administrator of the J project, I have easier
>access than some to a lot of information.
>
>
[snip,snip]

Don't you see though that you are making claims too that others could
call "baseless". To be a scientists means you have to lay down the
evidence for all to see. You have not done that. No one has, and because
of that there will always be endless discussion. I believe what you say
is accurate because I trust you, but to be proven as scientific fact
will take alot more than that (nothing personal, it is just the
scientific method at work). One needs to publish and lay out all the
details so that questions are answered clearly and with no further
doubt. If that can not or will not be done then you end up with this
endless discussion over and over as you said ...

So when is Behar or someone going to publish the difinitive work on this
so sensitive topic?
Al

This thread: