GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-04 > 1176557606
Subject: Re: [DNA] DYS 464
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:33:26 EDT
The Meek people involved were also R1b1c. Sorry for that omission.
In a message dated 4/14/2007 8:16:25 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
I previously mentioned an instance of FTDNA's Arizona lab reporting
incorrect results for DYS464 for a R1b1c member of the Italy DNA
Project. In that case, the participant had (like the Meeks mentioned
here, as best I can tell) only two distinct alleles. The Arizona lab
reported 15-15-15-17 but the Houston lab (using DYS464X) found the
actual value to be 15-15-17-17.
I agree with Chris that the majority of reported DYS464 results are
probably correct. However, I think this serves as a valuable
reminder that multi-copy markers must be used cautiously .
If you want to use DYS464, have double duplicate or a triplicate
alleles (e.g. 14-14-17-17 or 15-15-15-18) from the original DYS464
test, and are in haplogroup R1b1c, then you probably are a good
candidate for the DYS464X upgrade. It is not clear to me whether
DYS464X will help folks outside of R1b1c, however.
On Apr 14, 2007, at 6:43 AM, wrote:
> I am not in a position to know why this problem exists or how wide
> spread it
> might be. I am sure that the vast majority of results for DYS 464 are
> correct. However, if you have an individual in a group with a
> mismatch in DYS 464
> that does not look right you may want to consider ordering the
> extended test
> for DYS 464 (DYS 464X) under Order Tests > Advanced Orders on the
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject
and the body of the message
Christopher A. Meek
Meek(s) Family DNA project
Meek Genealogical Clearinghouse
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.