GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-04 > 1176807011
From: John Cartmell <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Malaspina et al (2001)'s Cohens -- an answer ?
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:50:11 +0100
References: <462443FC.5080101@sbcglobal.net><501994.22099.qm@web52105.mail.re2.yahoo.com><f3f05ce80704170331r6e3f5c31y2aa5686750644ac0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f3f05ce80704170331r6e3f5c31y2aa5686750644ac0@mail.gmail.com>
On 17 Apr, Dienekes Pontikos <> wrote:
> But, isn't this exactly what one expects to find in a regular surname
> project? A lot of matches with people bearing the same surname or its
> variants? What we can conclude for this is that a group of modern
> Cohens have a common ancestor. Whether or not that ancestor lived in
> medieval, or Roman or Hellenistic or Bronze Age or even earlier times
> is a separate issue.
And it is *critical* that it is handled separately. There will be no
confidence in results (except by those wanting the results that are claimed)
unless it is handled separately.
--
John 006 8822 or 0161 969 9820
Qercus magazineFAX +44 (0)8700-519-527www.finnybank.com
Qercus - the best guide to RISC OS computing
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Malaspina et al (2001)'s Cohens -- an answer ? by John Cartmell <> |