GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-04 > 1176808522


From: "Steven Bird" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Malaspina et al (2001)'s Cohens -- an answer ?
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:15:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <060e01c780dc$b938db20$6401a8c0@Precision360>


>
>In short, the best evidence would be quantitative statistics on a
>significant random sample of Cohanim.
>


That may be an inherent problem, since the Cohanim are, by definition, a
self-selected group. How would one achieve a random sample?

Steve

_________________________________________________________________
MSN is giving away a trip to Vegas to see Elton John. Enter to win today.
http://msnconcertcontest.com?icid-nceltontagline


This thread: