GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-04 > 1177009837
From: (John Chandler)
Subject: Re: [DNA] Malaspina et al (2001)'s Cohens -- an answer ?
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:10:37 -0400 (EDT)
References: <4626EC72.8010104@comcast.net> <46276E64.9090501@sbcglobal.net>
In-Reply-To: <46276E64.9090501@sbcglobal.net> (aburto@sbcglobal.net)
Al wrote:
> By the way I notice in the paper (Thomas et al (1998)) the words "Cohen"
> and "Cohanim" used interchangeably. Perhaps not a good paractice.
"Cohen" is the singular, while "Cohanim" is the plural. There is no
etymological difference.
John Chandler
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Malaspina et al (2001)'s Cohens -- an answer ? by (John Chandler) |