GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-05 > 1178043120


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Subclade of E-M34 (old E3b3a) with YCAII=18,22
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:12:00 -0600
References: <BAY111-DAV1120ED038EF18EE186580B1430@phx.gbl> <4637750F.8030101@foothill.net><003a01c78c15$7cb2e850$6400a8c0@Ken1><46377A74.2070706@foothill.net>


I was not commenting one way or the other about the E haplogroup subclade
issue. I had just reached a point where a comment on misuse of GD seemed
appropriate.

My involvement with haplogroup E right now is pretty much limited to using a
52 slowest marker haplotype for an E clade founder as sort of a root for my
United Founders Tree at http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net I'd love to have
reliable 52 marker haplotypes for more than one E clade founder.

Ken




----- Original Message -----
From: "William L Harvey" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Subclade of E-M34 (old E3b3a) with YCAII=18,22


> So-- are you agreeing or not agreeing with my skepticism regarding the
> subclade determination suggested by Larry?
>
> Bill
>
>
> Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "William L Harvey" <>
>>
>>
>>> Perhaps you are working with excessively large genetic distances in
>>> attempting to establish new "STR" subclades with such small population
>>> samples?
>>
>> Using GD as most people understand it is not the way to look for or
>> "define"
>> new subclades Ken
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
>> with the word 'unsubscribe' without
>> the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>>
>>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: