GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-05 > 1178461179


From: "ljcrain2" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] K2 markers
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 09:19:39 -0500
References: <3.0.6.32.20070506065539.04692e10@samsloan.com>


We have a K2 participant in the Sizemore DNA Project. Note he has been SNP
tested. #3213.

http://www.genpage.com/DNAindex.html

His ancestry is here:

http://www.genpage.com/3213.html


As generated by FTDNA:

http://www.familytreedna.com/public/SIZEMORE_DNA/index.aspx?fixed_columns=on

ySearch # TBBZN

Janet Crain
Sizemore DNA Project


----- Original Message -----
From: "Sam Sloan" <>
To: <>; "HOPE A. CARNICLE"
<>
Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 5:55 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] K2 markers


> At 05:19 AM 5/6/2007 -0400, HOPE A. CARNICLE wrote:
>>
>>
>>Sam,
>>
>>We have a 3 participants in our Freeman DNA project who are K2 and
>>one of them matches 7 out of 8 of Jefferson's markers. His results
>>were transferred in from National Geographic
>>
>> Jefferson N19351
>>DYS393 13 13
>>DYS390 24 24
>>DYS19 15 15
>>DYS391 10 10
>>DYS388 12 12
>>DYS389I 12 12
>>DYS389II 27 27
>>DYS392 15 14
>>
>>Sorry they didn't line up too well...but think you can figure
>>it out
>>
>>Hope
>>Freeman DNA Project
>>http://carnicle.com/DNA_Project/test.htm
>
> Can I ask a question?
>
> N19351 is easily the closest match I have ever seen. You say that this was
> transferred in from the National Geographic Project. I cannot find it. Is
> there anyway to verify these numbers are correct and not a transcription
> error?
>
>
> Here are your three K2 members:
>
> N19351 K2 13 24 15 10 15 16 11 12 11 12 14 27
>
> 68380 Edward - 1812 in SC K2 13 23 14 10 14 15 11 12 12 14 13 30
>
> 76390 Martin Fralix - 1818 in SC K2 13 23 14 10 14 15 11 12 12 14 13 30
>
> As we can see, Edward and Martin Fralix are an exact match right across.
>
> However, N19351 only matches on 3 out of 12.
>
> Why is it that they are all classified the same: K2 ?
>
> Sam Sloan
>
>
>

This thread: