GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-06 > 1181266598
From: (John Chandler)
Subject: Re: [DNA] Megalith Builders
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
References: <193461.9133.qm@web52111.mail.re2.yahoo.com><000801c7a621$3606dee0$6401a8c0@Richard><REME20070605172210@alum.mit.edu><007c01c7a7c9$4574dc20$6401a8c0@Richard><REME20070607155824@alum.mit.edu><00d501c7a95b$082885e0$6401a8c0@Richard>
In-Reply-To: <00d501c7a95b$082885e0$6401a8c0@Richard> (rigastev@cox.net)
Rich wrote:
> I didn't claim anything like what you are saying. I merely said there is a
> correlation between certain y-haplogroups and certain language families.
Pardon me, but I took the liberty of filling in the specific statements
you've made in the past for those weasel words "certain y-haplogroups"
and "certain language families". You claimed exactly what I said, as
recently as last week. If you're going to retract everything except
the weasel words, then there's nothing left on the table, except the
studies I mentioned, which have indeed looked for, and failed to find,
correlations between languages and haplogroups, both Y and mtDNA.
John Chandler
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Megalith Builders by (John Chandler) |