GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-06 > 1182704869


From: "R. & G. Stevens" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Megalith builders
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 13:07:18 -0500
References: <79d120de0705250607k430ebea0q21cd657f2b5eb39b@mail.gmail.com><200706030646.31826.didier.vernade@orange.fr><f60a109d0706231611y537749d6ga821f85036f48b54@mail.gmail.com><7kincaids%40primus.ca$142.154.19.30$.000f01c7b5fc$7c70c5e0$1e139a8e@PAKINCAID><f60a109d0706232348r702013cdm73ab3e378b8a2dc2@mail.gmail.com><008001c7b687$254c0e10$6501a8c0@Richard><002d01c7b680$1e74f900$6400a8c0@Ken1>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 11:52 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Megalith builders


> "Enslavement" is not really part of genetic genealogy.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

When it is used to explain the distribution of y-haplogroups and their
subclades in various parts of Europe it certainly is. I agree that is
overemphasized, however, and that word "slave" is tossed about rather
recklessly.

Rich

This thread: