GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-06 > 1182706027


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Megalith builders
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 11:27:07 -0600
References: <79d120de0705250607k430ebea0q21cd657f2b5eb39b@mail.gmail.com><200706030646.31826.didier.vernade@orange.fr><f60a109d0706231611y537749d6ga821f85036f48b54@mail.gmail.com><7kincaids%40primus.ca$142.154.19.30$.000f01c7b5fc$7c70c5e0$1e139a8e@PAKINCAID><f60a109d0706232348r702013cdm73ab3e378b8a2dc2@mail.gmail.com><008001c7b687$254c0e10$6501a8c0@Richard><002d01c7b680$1e74f900$6400a8c0@Ken1><00c501c7b68a$80f461b0$6501a8c0@Richard>


You know, the minute my message went out the door I thought my last sentence
was not quite true. When 25 to 30 percent of self-identified black American
males turn up with European ydna haplogroups, slavery had something to do
with it.

Ken




----- Original Message -----
From: "R. & G. Stevens" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Megalith builders


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2007 11:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Megalith builders
>
>
>> "Enslavement" is not really part of genetic genealogy.
> ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> When it is used to explain the distribution of y-haplogroups and their
> subclades in various parts of Europe it certainly is. I agree that is
> overemphasized, however, and that word "slave" is tossed about rather
> recklessly.
>
> Rich
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: