GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-07 > 1184349727


From: "Elizabeth O'Donoghue" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Bottlenecks - R1b1c7 as a calibration tool -The"final"version
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 19:02:23 +0100
In-Reply-To: <3b2a446a0707130120t1de6656dwf538c90cad901bd4@mail.gmail.com>


On 7/13/07, James Heald <> wrote:


> Again, as I posted earler, am I right in thinking that some of Z's
> associates have run such simulations and discussed results ?


There is a 2006 article called "*Difference Between Evolutionarily
Effective and Germ-line Mutation Rate due to Stochastically Varying
Haplogroup Size*"



> Can anyone summarise what they found ?

Sasson Margaliot wrote:

They found that under assumption of "*constant total population size*" the
simulations do show "the accumulated variance is on average 3-to-4 times
smaller".
------------------------
Sasson - smaller than what?

Is this article available online? Elizabeth


Sasson

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message



This thread: