GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-07 > 1184437806


From: "Sasson Margaliot" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Bottlenecks - R1b1c7 as a calibration tool -The"final"version
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:30:06 +0300
References: <3b2a446a0707130120t1de6656dwf538c90cad901bd4@mail.gmail.com><KHEKIJEABJGJEKDPFEDMCEDPDPAA.Elizabethod@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <KHEKIJEABJGJEKDPFEDMCEDPDPAA.Elizabethod@eircom.net>


On 7/13/07, Elizabeth O'Donoghue <> wrote:

> Sasson - smaller than what?

smaller than observed mutation rate - this is so-called "fudge factor"

>> They found that under assumption of "constant total population size"
>> the simulations do show "the accumulated variance is on average
>> 3-to-4 times smaller".

> Is this article available online? Elizabeth

It is available from Oxford Journals, but not for free.






> On 7/13/07, James Heald <> wrote:
>
>
> > Again, as I posted earler, am I right in thinking that some of Z's
> > associates have run such simulations and discussed results ?
>
>
> There is a 2006 article called "*Difference Between Evolutionarily
> Effective and Germ-line Mutation Rate due to Stochastically Varying
> Haplogroup Size*"
>
>
>
> > Can anyone summarise what they found ?
>
> Sasson Margaliot wrote:
>
> ------------------------
> Sasson - smaller than what?
>
> Is this article available online? Elizabeth
>
>
> Sasson
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>

This thread: