GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-07 > 1185731424


From: "Dora Smith" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Is H2a2 the same thing as H2b?
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:50:24 -0500
References: <BAY111-DAV81ED7B9310433DBCC860BBCED0@phx.gbl>


Ron, according to the cladistic diagram that Ann just posted, 8598 defines
H2b, and 4769 defines H2a. It says that she based it on Roostalu's new
(2007) article.

Do you know of samples that have both 8598 and 4769? ... Um, yup, I'd say
you do, because that's what you've posted. It sounds like there's a
further cladistic wrinkle here. But usually both 8598 appears without
4769, AND 4769 appears without 8598?

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Scott" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 10:51 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Is H2a2 the same thing as H2b?


> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:46:50 EDT, Ann posts a diagram that reads "Rootsali
> found samples that had 1438 but did not have 4769." I infer this branch
> to have 8598 but lacking 4769 (H2b). Since GenBank's AY738961 has 4769
> and 8598, but lacking 1438 (back mutation?), in what subgroup would this
> participant be, H2b, H2a3 or something different?
>
> GEN-SNiP's mutation list for AY738961:
> T152C A263G 315insC T319C A750G A4769G T8598C A8860G T13281C
> G13928A A15326G C16266T T16311C T16362C
>
> Ron Scott
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>



--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/897 - Release Date: 7/11/2007 9:57 PM

This thread: