GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-07 > 1185731743


From: "Dora Smith" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Is H2a2 the same thing as H2b?
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 12:55:43 -0500
References: <c17.1c449e46.33de1773@aol.com>


Hold it - how is it possible to match the CRS at 1438 but have downstream
mutations, unless there was a back mutation, or a mistake?

Yours,
Dora Smith
Austin, TX

----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Is H2a2 the same thing as H2b?


> In a message dated 7/29/2007 8:54:24 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> writes:
>
>> On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:46:50 EDT, Ann posts a diagram that reads
>> "Rootsali
>> found samples that had 1438 but did not have 4769." I infer this branch
>> to
>> have 8598 but lacking 4769 (H2b). Since GenBank's AY738961 has 4769 and
>> 8598,
>> but lacking 1438 (back mutation?), in what subgroup would this
>> participant
>> be, H2b, H2a3 or something different?
>>
>> GEN-SNiP's mutation list for AY738961:
>> T152C A263G 315insC T319C A750G A4769G T8598C A8860G T13281C
>> G13928A A15326G C16266T T16311C T16362C
>
> In Roostalu's scheme, that would be H2b. It matches the CRS at the H2
> level,
> so 1438 is not on the list of differences.
>
> Ann Turner
>
>
> **************************************
> Get a sneak peek of the
> all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>



--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.4/897 - Release Date: 7/11/2007 9:57 PM

This thread: