GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-09 > 1190071276
From: "Rebekah Canada" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] GG Terms of the Week - Genotype vs. Phenotype
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 18:21:16 -0500
References: <REME20070917145338@alum.mit.edu><BAY132-F35EA86E77E04FDE1BF8C37B4BF0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY132-F35EA86E77E04FDE1BF8C37B4BF0@phx.gbl>
He is bound to leave DNA all over the place. Bodily fluids here,
Clumps of hair there, Bear mark over yonder. It will be a cinch for
any female Genetic Genealogist to trace him back to the garage he left
uncleaned, the trash he did not take out...
Case closed by lunch with plenty of time left over for his widow to
call JW and chat about ways to spend the insurance money when it comes
in. <EG>
On 9/17/07, Robert Hughes <> wrote:
> John Chandler raises an interesting point. If a male genetic genealogist is
> in the forest and he makes a mistake and there is no female around to catch
> it, is he still wrong?
--
Regards,
Rebekah
"The answer's in a forest carved upon a tree." Gordon Lightfoot
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] GG Terms of the Week - Genotype vs. Phenotype by "Rebekah Canada" <> |