GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-10 > 1191846449


From: "Rebekah Canada" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] FGS posting on Mitosearch
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 07:27:29 -0500
References: <cec.1bf77688.343ad55b@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <cec.1bf77688.343ad55b@aol.com>


I think that the GenBank submission would be the better way to go. You
could always list the GenBank number with a link to GenBank in the
notes. That would also provide for accuracy.

On 10/7/07, <> wrote:
> ...
> You can always post the HVR1/2 on mitosearch with a note in the "Additional
> information" That you have had FGS done. I don't suppose there is anything
> to keep you from listing the coding mutations there either. I advise people
> to put FGS into GenBank, where it's available to researchers. I don't know of
> any researchers who have used FTDNA or Argus Bio sequences yet, but my
> feeling is that if we keep adding our sequences, one of these days the academics
> will have to "catch up" with the genetic genealogy community because there
> will be so many FGS from our community that our data has swamped the data they
> collected. ;)
>
> After all, once you have paid that much for a test, why NOT make it
> available to the scientific community?
>
> Anne


--
Regards,
Rebekah
"dedique cor meum ut scirem prudentiam atque doctrinam erroresque et
stultitiam et agnovi quod in his quoque esset labor et adflictio
spiritus"
Ecc 1:17

This thread: