GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-11 > 1194021433


From: "grandcross" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Sorenson and SNPs
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 11:37:13 -0500
References: <d69.16890461.345c9cd6@aol.com>


Ann Turner wrote:


On the other hand, if you base a
> haplogroup V prediction solely on the presence of 16298C (very common but
> not
> quite universal in that haplogroup), you would be wrong over half the
> time.

Interesting. I assume you mean to imply haplogroup V is defined with greater
assurance by the results found in HVR2. What should someone be looking for
there to confirm hap V apart from an HVR1 presence of 16298C, which takes
you halfway home?

This thread: