GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-11 > 1194112654
From: Elizabeth Kipp <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] are all Genetic Genealogists over 50?
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 13:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <BAY140-F39C090E933295D079E8613E48E0@phx.gbl>
I was always curious about family names and stories but I wasn't interested in microfilm, fiche, census, parish registers and the compilation. Perhaps the budding genealogist is there inside and it just takes something to bring into perspective. I have to rely on some very old memories but amazingly as I search back the fuzzy memory matches the data :)
Nelda Percival <> wrote: Ned,
I was in my 40's before I asked questions about family names and in my
fifties before I started doing Genealogy.
Before that life was to full and yes, I think it has to do with our own
mortality......
LOL, wonder if we all have a common marker that will identify the
genealogist... and we all share this marker... and thats why some are
interested and some are not... LOL
Elizabeth (Blake) Kipp, PLCGS
Guild of one-name studies #4600 - LAMBDEN, PINCOMBE and SIDERFIN
Webpage: http://ca.geocities.com//
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] are all Genetic Genealogists over 50? by Elizabeth Kipp <> |