GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-12 > 1196861097
From: "Annie & Wal" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Will FTDNA introduce a test for more than 67markers?-Re:Novice ...
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 23:24:57 +1000
Obviously I write in Australian, the word force, implies to coerce,
bully or persuade to do something that you would not normally do.
I'm not sure anyone can "force" someone else to do extra testing.
"persuade" or maybe even "bully" but I think "force" is "purt nigh
impossible." I do hope the below is taken as no more than something to
and as "persuade" at the max!
Have you looked for matches at _www.smgf.org_ (http://www.smgf.org) ?
_www.ysearch.org_ (http://www.ysearch.org) ? at _www.ybase.org_
at _www.yhrd.org_ (http://www.yhrd.org) ? at _www.oxfordancestors.com_
(http://www.oxfordancestors.com) ? If you have looked at all these
finding any matches, I would point out that the upgrade to 25 markers
quite inexpensive now, and it is possible that you might find some
have seen what looked not to be a "match" at 12 turn into one at 25.
the most common outcome, but I have to tell you -- if I personally had
matches anywhere out of all the databases above, I'd sure spend the
13-25 on the chance that I just have some unusual mutation something
To me that smallish amount of money would be worth it. What joy if I
a 22/25 match or better!
Beyond 25, if you still have no matches, then I'd suspect you are in the
"waiting game" -- waiting for someone with the right DNA to decide to
Of course, I am a DNA junkie--excuse me while I go mug someone for the
for my next hit! ;)
**************************************Check out AOL's list of 2007's
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without
the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
|Re: [DNA] Will FTDNA introduce a test for more than 67markers?-Re:Novice ... by "Annie & Wal" <>|