GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-12 > 1196986554


From: "Sasson Margaliot" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Ashkenazim or Sephardim: tribal identity?
Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 02:15:54 +0200
References: <5.0.0.25.2.20071130122049.01327e90@mail.insightbb.com><009c01c833ac$e7eba230$6501a8c0@Richard><3b2a446a0712010901w5116a969r179167af533ee361@mail.gmail.com><00a301c8343d$6de765f0$6501a8c0@Richard><3b2a446a0712021628o159ac88ds57bef4dd1fe03c96@mail.gmail.com><004601c83554$b3324400$6501a8c0@Richard><3b2a446a0712022131q69e3b835y91b927e913576bf9@mail.gmail.com><002001c8379d$4e32bbc0$6501a8c0@Richard>
In-Reply-To: <002001c8379d$4e32bbc0$6501a8c0@Richard>


Rich

In case of the Bible, no translation is a primary source. And yes, I do read
Hebrew.

Best

Sasson





On Dec 6, 2007 2:16 AM, R. Stevens <> wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sasson Margaliot" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 12:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Ashkenazim or Sephardim: tribal identity?
>
>
> > Bit you asked for *primary* source. Are not English Bibles derived from
> > Hebrew scriptures?
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________
>
> A primary source is a primary source even in translation. Do you read
> Hebrew?
>
> If a primary source must be in the original language, why not insist on
> the
> original manuscript, as well?
>
> Rich
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>

This thread: