GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2007-12 > 1199048828


From: Kirsten Saxe <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Any news on the "WalkThrough theY"initiative??(Theprocess, & a different approach)
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:07:08 -0500
References: <11985d4c0712291203s44d3bd95l7abbffd6e7dafa01@mail.gmail.com><IGEOKAGLHNEKPCKPADIGEENIABAB.bbailey.lowedna@baileyconnection.com> <11985d4c0712291324ubd15c05sef7d91bc8b7994e@mail.gmail.com><00e501c84a62$8d998c80$6400a8c0@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <00e501c84a62$8d998c80$6400a8c0@Ken1>


I don't know if this helps, but I think that around the time the Walk on
Y concept was first presented, Thomas Krahn said that an R1b or R1b1c
individual could expect to learn of 2 private SNPs from a walk on the Y.
Maybe he can comment on the prospects for Haplogroup I men, too.

Kirsten

Ken Nordtvedt wrote:

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rebekah Canada" <>
>To: <>
>Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2007 2:24 PM
>Subject: Re: [DNA] Any news on the "Walk Through
>theY"initiative??(Theprocess, & a different approach)
>
>
>
>
>>We would want to run three samples from each cluster for the same
>>50,000 segment. If predictions are correct there will be on average
>>average average two SNPs per sample.
>>
>>
>
>How did you arrive at a predicted two SNPs per sample? And is this two per
>sample mutations relative to the other samples from the same cluster or same
>haplogroup, private mutations included, or relative to a distant standard
>from outside of your haplogroup?
>
>Ken
>
>
>
>-------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
>
>

This thread: