GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-01 > 1199201285


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Proposed New SNP Law
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 08:28:05 -0700
References: <018d01c84bfb$ab01de40$6400a8c0@Ken1><11985d4c0801010400p62f501a1xfdc3b75fb90751af@mail.gmail.com>


TIC! TIC! or an early 1 April 2008

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rebekah Canada" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 5:00 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Proposed New SNP Law


> Ken,
>
> This is very much a 'weights and measures' issue. I think that every
> last STR sold should have a link to the primer set being used and
> every new SNP should have its exact location on the y-chromosome
> disclosed and its extended STR profile published.
>
> But why get anyone else involved? We, as the customer, could just ask
> for these things? No?
>
> On Dec 31, 2007 4:22 PM, Ken Nordtvedt <> wrote:
>> When Congress convenes after the New year I have a proposed law for them
>> to pass:
>>
>> Every new downstream SNP that a company brings to market should first
>> have had the dna sample found positive for it measured for its 67 marker
>> haplotype and the results entered into a public database.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Rebekah
> ISOGG Resource Coordinator
> Volunteer Administrator: H mtDNA Project; Q yDNA Project; Scandinavian
> yDNA Project
> Co-Administrator: I1a yDNA Project
> "dedique cor meum ut scirem prudentiam atque doctrinam erroresque et
> stultitiam et agnovi quod in his quoque esset labor et adflictio
> spiritus"
> Ecc 1:17
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: