GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-01 > 1201343149


From: "George Kelly" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Panel 5 FTDNA markers
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:25:49 -0600
References: <11860856.430901201312798794.JavaMail.www@wwinf1607><438D9167DABF4A058FF38372A649B543@titi>


Didier,
My DYF399x completion date is estimated abt. 10 March 08. & my haploGroup is
R1b.
George

----- Original Message -----
From: "Didier Vernade" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 3:22 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Panel 5 FTDNA markers


> DYF399x is a fast mutating marker with an interesting c / t pattern. I
> take
> advantage of this reply to insist on the separator value of these markers
> :
> I1a and I1b have very different values for example.
>
> Didier
>
> I hope yoyre right. With a recLOH on 459 & another on 464 in my Y-37
> FTDNA
> data I ordered DYF399x & will neet help to interpret.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Didier VERNADE" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 7:59 PM
> Subject: [DNA] Panel 5 FTDNA markers
>
>
>> List,
>> There is still no room for Panel 5 markers for FTDNA on ysearch database
>> and ymatch isn't very successfull it seems. It's a pity because I think
>> that some of these markers are excellent separators and deserve much more
>> attention. If more people were testing for these markers (in place of
>> many
>> of the "67" set) I think that new clusters would emerge. My preferate
>> ones
>> are DYS397 , DYF408, DYS725 and DYF371x. I disagree with what seems to be
>> FTDNA "strategy" : keeping these for those who already tested for the
>> whole set of 67 markers.
>>
>> Didier vernade
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.19.11/1244 - Release Date:
> 1/25/2008 7:44 PM
>

This thread: