GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-01 > 1201491564


From: "Jerry L. Ivey" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Panel 5 FTDNA markers
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:39:24 -0600
References: <mailman.53448.1201315746.17915.genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com><479D1BE5.1000206@storm.ca><11985d4c0801271916m7a10fe3cva6544e8d2e92b44f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <11985d4c0801271916m7a10fe3cva6544e8d2e92b44f@mail.gmail.com>


I am having 5 E3a participants with 67-marker results tested for the
Palindromic Pack in hope of possibly understanding the relationships of
some family lines with branches separated by 464, CDYa/b, and 534
values. Yes, I know, but these are the only markers which really show
significant trends.

Expectations are not extremely high, but who knows?

First results are beginning to trickle in, but final results will
probably not be available yet for several more weeks (months?).

Jerry L Ivey
http://www.jlivey.com/dna/Haplogroup-E3a-DNA-67.htm

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Rebekah Canada
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2008 9:16 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] Panel 5 FTDNA markers

Martin,

It may or may not prove useful for I1a. There simply are not enough test
results back yet to say -- fewer than 30.


On Jan 27, 2008 6:03 PM, Martin Potter <> wrote:
>
> Didier,
>
> Do you suggest Panel 5 testing for any particular haplogroups (I am
> I1a) or would you suggest it for everyone?
>
> ... Martin


This thread: