GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-02 > 1202147435


From: marianne dillow <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Recruiting recalcitrant relatives
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:50:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <11985d4c0802040923m5d4c419bhb5cb7d14b12a1fdb@mail.gmail.com>


Bob,
I think this kind of story hurts DNA testing. Or is your point your want everyone to test with SMFG and not test with other companies ? I would like for you to produce that story and post it for the entire list to read and judge it for theirself.

Marianne Dillow


Rebekah Canada <> wrote:
Bob,

Could you please post a link to the relevant news story? I do not
think that this is the sort of thing any of us want circulated
unverified. I truly am not sure what you meant to accomplish when you
wrote it.

On 2/4/08, Robert Stafford wrote:
...
>
> As I noted, I have no reason to worry about the confidentiality of commercial firms. However, there are some people who do. I was told that a sheriff in Alabama subpoenaed DNA results and/or a sample (not clear which) from a commercial testing firm, raising fears among some about testing.
>
> Bob Stafford

--
Regards,
Rebekah
ISOGG Resource Coordinator
Volunteer Administrator: H mtDNA Project; Q yDNA Project; Scandinavian
yDNA Project
Co-Administrator: I1a yDNA Project
"dedique cor meum ut scirem prudentiam atque doctrinam erroresque et
stultitiam et agnovi quod in his quoque esset labor et adflictio
spiritus"
Ecc 1:17






This thread: