GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-02 > 1202316767


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] The Story of I1b1 (P37.2+)
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 09:52:47 -0700
References: <c19.2e0fb65e.34da8a78@aol.com><003d01c86879$4744ec90$6400a8c0@Ken1><7A3832E7-A99E-474D-8E28-5EA39CAEBFF2@vizachero.com>


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vincent Vizachero" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 4:15 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] The Story of I1b1 (P37.2+)


> Calling your I1b1 proposal a "hypothesis" is no insult, I think, if
> you assume - as I did - that he meant it in the scientific sense of
> that word. And regardless of your skill at using STRs to define
> clades (a skill I don't personally question), the caution about
> repeatability is a good one.

[[[[[ Clades are found, not defined ]]]]]]



>
> In any event, at least he didn't call your clades "racist".
>
> Vince
>
>
>
>
> On Feb 5, 2008, at 11:32 PM, Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
>
>> Since you insult the clades by labeling them "hypothesized",
>> lacking SNPs,
>> and not in the scientific literature, I'm not sure I should respond.
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: