GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-02 > 1203038317
From: "Dan Draghici" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] ht15 / ht35: the answer ?
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:18:37 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
References: <8197215.61651202922931881.JavaMail.www@wwinf1502><BAY141-DAV5E0110B89DDBA7EE3783E8D240@phx.gbl><BAY141-DAV5708841DB483C1D08B6958D240@phx.gbl><61AADF20-D689-4FAE-B478-889CF157B0AA@vizachero.com>
I ordered DYF385 and DYF401. I can alway order DYF411, too.
Dan
-------Original Message-------
From: Vincent Vizachero
Date: 13/02/2008 9:32:15 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] ht15 / ht35: the answer ?
Dan,
The second marker we are examining in the ht35 project is DYF411, not
DYF401. Although we have found unusual results among some of our
participants at DYF411, it remains unclear how diagnostic DYF411 will
be in R1b1c.
I'm not saying you shouldn't order it, only that I am less confident
about its utility than I am about DYF385.
Vince
On Feb 13, 2008, at 6:56 PM, Dan Draghici wrote:
> I will have to test for the DYF385 and DYF401.
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message
This thread: