GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-04 > 1207097462


From: "David Faux" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] About 10% of R1b1c* is ancestral for rs34276300
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:51:02 -0700
References: <647312.87233.qm@web57014.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <647312.87233.qm@web57014.mail.re3.yahoo.com>


Thomas:

Just to add to what Mike has written, did the ancestral C men have DYS393=12
or 13 (likely p49a,f ht 35 or 15; Eastern versus Western R1b1c)? Thanks.

David.


On 4/1/08, Michael Maddi <> wrote:
>
> Thomas Krahn wrote:
>
> Sorry that I couldn't participate further on the
> discussion about rs34276300 because I had problems
> receiving e-mails from the list. Now I try to use my
> old e-mail address. We have now sequenced the
> rs34276300 marker for 97 persons that are R1b1c*
> (negative for all SNPs below M269 that FTDNA tests
> for). 9 persons carried the ancestral C allele. So as
> expected the majority
> of samples carry the derived A allele. However 10% of
> ancestral haplotypes is still a big number that may
> help us to divide R1b1c further. I hope this helps to
> clarify the situation so hat no more speculation is
> necessary.
>
> My reply:
>
> Thomas,
>
> Thanks for this very interesting information.
>
> Do you have an ethnic or geographic breakdown for the
> European ancestry of the 9 who are ancestral for S116?
> Or are there haplotypes on ysearch for some of them
> that we can look at?
>
> Mike Maddi
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster
> Total Access, No Cost.
> http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>

This thread: