GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-04 > 1207664081


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Hammer's Y Haplogroup Tree
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 10:14:41 -0400
References: <PM.7680.1207344563@hmweb-1.uk1.bibliotech.net><246baaff0804071613m59cd805avfbdecb8ecc760299@mail.gmail.com><001801c89905$e68967b0$6400a8c0@Ken1><3b2a446a0804072124x3caa60ecs72b459c66f3f1b1c@mail.gmail.com><AD0FD397-0B07-4CB1-AC7E-4F9110826FC9@vizachero.com><3b2a446a0804080657t3c8c4312h8935ebc125f9cbdb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3b2a446a0804080657t3c8c4312h8935ebc125f9cbdb@mail.gmail.com>


On Apr 8, 2008, at 9:57 AM, Sasson Margaliot wrote:

> Are they all true R1* ? I mean, were all the necessary markers
> downstream of
> R1 tested ?

Yes.


> Also, do they have typical R1* haplotypes ?

I don't think there is any such thing as a typical R1* haplotype.
The haplotypes are generally differentiable (if enough STRs are
compared) from R1a, R1a1, R1b1b, and R1b1c haplotypes , if that is
what you mean.

Vince


This thread: