GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-05 > 1211043386


From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine))
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 12:56:26 -0400
References: <170684.52703.qm@web90401.mail.mud.yahoo.com><7kincaids%40primus.ca$142.154.19.142$.5E83FF626EE64B91B24FFAA1B62F5029@PeterAKincaiPC><D02A9CF2-E5B4-434C-B431-F436CA5AE732@vizachero.com><7kincaids%40primus.ca$142.154.18.220$.2DF3580E09BA4E3D9A5289AAF839AE79@PeterAKincaiPC>
In-Reply-To: <7kincaids%40primus.ca$142.154.18.220$.2DF3580E09BA4E3D9A5289AAF839AE79@PeterAKincaiPC>


The only worthwhile objective is to find the best tool for the job.
There are plenty of people in the field who recognize that, thankfully.

If you someone can't figure out how to use a 12 marker test
productively, that is no one's business but theirs I suppose, but
hopefully people on this list are wise enough to recognize that the
problem lies in the implementor and not in the implement.

Vince


On May 17, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Peter A. Kincaid wrote:

> You are confusing ulterior objectives with "know better."


This thread: