RootsWeb: GENEALOGY-DNA-L Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine

GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-05 > 1211050962

From: Beth Long <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 12:02:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <230786.98779.qm@web81603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

Well, since all of us are consumers (of one thing or another), that means we're all irrational :-) On to another subject, anyone? Beth Robert Stafford <> wrote: I haven't seen any case hsitory to support that. What is your source? Bob Vincent Vizachero wrote: Almost as well-known as the underestimation of their rationality. VV On May 17, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Robert Stafford wrote: > The irrationality of consumers is a well-known phenomenon. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread:

[DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from Ancestors Magazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Vincent Vizachero <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by "Rebekah Canada" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by "H. B. Whitmore" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Larry Vick <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Beth Long <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Rebekah Canada" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
  - Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Beth Long <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Vincent Vizachero <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>

[DNA] Consumers are rational (was: Some truth in article was Re:Answer from AncestorsMagazine) by Vincent Vizachero <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Beth Long <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
  - Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
    - Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
      - Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
    - [DNA] Genebase? - Re: Some truth in article was Re: Answerfrom AncestorsMagazine by Kirsten Saxe <>
      - Re: [DNA] Genebase? - Re: Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
  - Re: [DNA] Some truth in article by "Lawrence Mayka" <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
- [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article (wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Vincent Vizachero <>
  - Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article(was Re: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Rebekah Canada" <>
  - Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
    - Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Vincent Vizachero <>
      - Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
        Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Beth Long <>
        Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Vincent Vizachero <>
        Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truthinarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
        Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truthinarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Alister John Marsh" <>
        Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Sometruthinarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
        [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "herb_316" <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "Dale E. Reddick" <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "herb_316" <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "herb_316" <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Mitzi* Bateman <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Beth Long <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting- what constitutes "match". by "Alister John Marsh" <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting- what constitutes "match". by Nelda Percival <>
        [DNA] DNA] Y-DNA tEsting- what constitutes "match". by "Lewis Townsend" <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
        Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
  - Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Michael Maddi <>
    - Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Beth Long <>
- Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Roberta J. Estes" <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Larry Vick <>

Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by