GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: [DNA] Consumers are rational (was: Some truth in article was Re:Answer from AncestorsMagazine)
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:04:04 -0400
References: <230786.98779.qm@web81603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <230786.98779.qm@web81603.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

We are way off topic, Bob. Go your closest library and look up some
peer-reviewed articles by Gary Becker or Kevin Murphy if you are
truly interested.

Alternatively, if you seriously expect me to accept your word
because of your "advanced degree in science" then just accept mine
based on my degree in economics.

Vince


On May 17, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Robert Stafford wrote:

> I haven't seen any case hsitory to support that. What is your source?

This thread:

• Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Larry Vick <>
  • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Beth Long <>
    • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Rebekah Canada" <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
          • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Beth Long <>
      • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Vincent Vizachero <>
          • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>

            • [DNA] Consumers are rational (was: Some truth in article was Re:Answer from AncestorsMagazine) by Vincent Vizachero <>

            • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Beth Long <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
          • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
            • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
              • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
                • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
              • [DNA] Genebase? - Re: Some truth in article was Re: Answerfrom AncestorsMagazine by Kirsten Saxe <>
                • Re: [DNA] Genebase? - Re: Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "David Faux" <>
          • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
            • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article by "Lawrence Mayka" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
    • [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article (wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Vincent Vizachero <>
      • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article(was Re: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Rebekah Canada" <>
      • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
        • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth in article(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Vincent Vizachero <>
          • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
            • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Beth Long <>
            • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Vincent Vizachero <>
              • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truthinarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
            • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truthinarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Alister John Marsh" <>
              • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Sometruthinarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
              • [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "herb_316" <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "Dale E. Reddick" <>
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "herb_316" <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "herb_316" <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Mitzi* Bateman <>
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Beth Long <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting- what constitutes "match". by "Alister John Marsh" <>
                    • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting- what constitutes "match". by Nelda Percival <>
                      • [DNA] DNA] Y-DNA tEsting- what constitutes "match". by "Lewis Townsend" <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by
                  • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
                    • Re: [DNA] Y-DNA tEsting by Nelda Percival <>
      • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Michael Maddi <>
        • Re: [DNA] 12 STR tests are useful (was Re: Some truth inarticle(wasRe: Answer from Ancestors Magazine)) by Beth Long <>
    • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Roberta J. Estes" <>
  • [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from Ancestors Magazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
    • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Vincent Vizachero <>
    • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by "Rebekah Canada" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
    • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by "H. B. Whitmore" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer from AncestorsMagazine by Robert Stafford <>
  • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by Larry Vick <>
  • Re: [DNA] Some truth in article was Re: Answer fromAncestorsMagazine by