GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-05 > 1211407986


From: Bud Rogers <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] S21/S28 Split+m223 stuff
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 17:13:06 -0500
References: <200805211517.m4LFH0lt016615@mail.rootsweb.com>
In-Reply-To: <200805211517.m4LFH0lt016615@mail.rootsweb.com>


On Wednesday 21 May 2008 10:16:51 Elizabeth O'Donoghue wrote:
> Alan, I'm not sure you can say that Ken's dates 'imply that all S116+
> R1b and also S21 post-dates 1600BC so that would include almost all
> of the R1b1c* folk too'.  Do we know enough about R1b1c* (old name)
> to make such an assumption?  Maybe I've missed it - have any R1b1c*
> been tested for S116?

Hi Elizabeth,

I am R1b1c*. My S116 results are pending at EA. I have tested positive
for rs34276300+ at FTDNA, which I understand is the same thing. I know
there are at least a few others. We have had an ongoing conversation
at DNA-forums.

Bud Rogers
2KECY


This thread: