GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-06 > 1212336434
From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] matches at 66 out of 67 markers
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2008 12:07:14 EDT
What it looks like to me re the "quibbling" is really just viewpoints from
the more scientific types vs viewpoints from some (or maybe just one...me) who
really don't understand all the terms and factors in the matches and how it
works. I guess "hope" is unscientific, but as people, that's how we
are...hopeful, yet appreciative of the scientific tools at our disposal that might
result in our "hope" becoming a scientific reality. "Can't we all just get
along?" ...and "Agree to Disagree"...etc...barf.
In a message dated 6/1/2008 8:18:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
writes:
On Jun 1, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Bill Howard wrote:
> Frankly, I don't think this type of quibbling is productive for the
> majority of readers of this board, especially since we are already
> inundated with more appropriate, substantive material every day.....
What could be more relevant to a list called "Genealogy - DNA" than a
discussion about why and how people ought to use DNA testing in their
genealogical investigations?
Vince
**************Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with
Tyler Florence" on AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/tyler-florence?video=4&?NCID=aolfod00030000000002)
This thread: