GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: Doug McDonald <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 07:17:01 -0500
References: <11985d4c0806061406v7182a2d5j536981566fe1e4f5@mail.gmail.com><BAY133-F34E4E566E059FBB1FEC010F1B70@phx.gbl><11985d4c0806062009v60e9569cn5ea9aace7f129c68@mail.gmail.com> <1FB88BA9-29D1-41C8-B1FB-60E124CAF860@vizachero.com><BAY103-DAV80B4B93AA33965806C0FAC8B60@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY103-DAV80B4B93AA33965806C0FAC8B60@phx.gbl>

RICHARD KENYON wrote:
> The website of the Keck lab at Yale University (to which I gave a link
> in an earlier message) included a price list for Affymetrix and Illumina
> chip processing. Some applications might require considerable developmental
> expenses to design the chip. However in the case of a y-DNA chip, the choice
> of oligonucleotides would be simple, once the set of SNPs to be tested has
> been selected. (It's not clear to me if SNPs that are actually insertions or
> deletions, rather than simple base substitutions, can be tested as easily on
> a micro-array).

This depends on the exact case. Some can, some can't.

Doug McDonald

This thread:

• [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Bill Howard <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
    • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Bill Howard <>
      • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Doug McDonald <>
      • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "RICHARD KENYON" <>
        • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "Didier Vernade" <>
          • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "RICHARD KENYON" <>
        • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "Didier Vernade" <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
    • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "RICHARD KENYON" <>
    • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "Ian Logan" <>
      • [DNA] Some thoughts on the need for clearer haplogroup terminologyand a fresh look at how we report mtDNA results by Bill Howard <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some thoughts on the need for clearer haplogroupterminology and a fresh look at how we report mtDNA results by "bbailey.lowedna" <>
          • Re: [DNA] Some thoughts on the need for clearerhaplogroupterminology and a fresh look at how we report mtDNAresults by "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <>
        • Re: [DNA] Some thoughts on the need for clearer haplogroupterminology and a fresh look at how we report mtDNA results by "William Hurst" <>
          • Re: [DNA] Some thoughts on the need for clearer haplogroupterminology and a fresh look at how we report mtDNA results by DARRELL CHADDERTON <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
    • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "Rebekah Canada" <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
    • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "Rebekah Canada" <>
      • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Vincent Vizachero <>
      • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "William Hurst" <>
        • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "Rebekah Canada" <>
          • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Vincent Vizachero <>
            • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by "RICHARD KENYON" <>
              • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Vincent Vizachero <>

              • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Doug McDonald <>

  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
    • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by David F Reynolds <>
  • [DNA] SNPs on chip by Didier VERNADE <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by Gareth Henson <>
  • Re: [DNA] SNPs on chip by