GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-06 > 1214094867
From: Vincent Vizachero <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Spread of R1b AMH
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:34:27 -0400
References: <d61.2f0ca240.358dbf4f@aol.com><001d01c8d38e$8fd5cf30$6501a8c0@Richard><D1F37A55959C49F0A7D074D9523DA95C@bobPC><000b01c8d3c1$cc67c240$6501a8c0@Richard><E9ABEBD67F9849B2863475F90BAD30E1@bobPC><007801c8d3cf$a849a9b0$6501a8c0@Richard><8D532282EFC345EDB18ECA42DCF9425D@bobPC>
In-Reply-To: <8D532282EFC345EDB18ECA42DCF9425D@bobPC>
That's not what he is implying.
He is saying that a gene (T-13910) that arose just 10 kya in a place
far away from Franco-Cantabria is present at high levels among the
Basque. Ergo, they are not a perfectly isolated remnant of pre-LGM
Europeans.
Beyond that, he is asking (I think rhetorically), if T-13910 entered
the Basques in the past 10 ky and became dominant, what rules out the
possibility that R-M269 did the same thing?
VV
On Jun 21, 2008, at 5:03 PM, Bob Bootle wrote:
> What you say below seems to imply that only those in Haplogroups
> dating from
> less than 10 000 years ago can have T-13910 lactase persistence
> allele.
> Is that the case ?
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Spread of R1b AMH by Vincent Vizachero <> |