GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-09 > 1220671037
From: "Anatole Klyosov" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Age of R1b
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 23:17:17 -0400
From: "Dienekes Pontikos" < >
>To prove that R1a1 arrived in Britain 5,000 years ago, you must either
find it in 5,000-year-old bones from Britain, or find a
British-specific clade that is separated by 5,000 years from its
It will be proven or disproved in due time. You want too much at once.
Dienekes, it is not a fair game, if your comments are critical. It is a fair
game, if you comments approves it as a working hypothesis and present a plan
for future actions, examinations, verifications.
Otherwise, it is unfair. Some people analyze haplotypes, find novel data and
try to make ends meet, putting forward working hypotheses. Other people sit
a a fence saying - "no, no, no, there might be other explanations, hence,
your explanation is WRONG. We do not have data to prove otherwise, however,
you explanation is presumed guilty".
|Re: [DNA] Age of R1b by "Anatole Klyosov" <>|