GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-09 > 1220687371
From: Nelda Percival <>
Subject: [DNA] Ancestry.com compared to FTDNA
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 02:49:31 -0500
References: <ea3bd9560809051659n28a52b47od5bb6c87c96ede3f@mail.gmail.com><e2f96c1b0809052108r16fbe4f8v9e074fb34e564f39@mail.gmail.com><ea3bd9560809052129h261240bfxa1d4669fa9c5777b@mail.gmail.com><e2f96c1b0809052226i5432eaf6naf24ae68e79fa26a@mail.gmail.com> <ea3bd9560809060023w4f627cbbqc022ee1e2d59abe0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ea3bd9560809060023w4f627cbbqc022ee1e2d59abe0@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
I don't know where to find what markers need conversion when comparing ancestrydna to FTDNA?
Do you know what markers? and by how many? The only two that seem far off are:
DYS442
H4
thank you Nelda L. PercivalCopy Right information:
http://www.pddoc.com/copyright/copyright_facts.htm
********************************************
My websites
http://freepages.folklore.rootsweb.com/~bonsteinandgilpin/
This thread:
| [DNA] Ancestry.com compared to FTDNA by Nelda Percival <> |