GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-09 > 1220721497


From: "Charles Hollenbeck" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Ancestry.com compared to FTDNA
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 10:18:17 -0700
References: <ea3bd9560809051659n28a52b47od5bb6c87c96ede3f@mail.gmail.com><e2f96c1b0809052108r16fbe4f8v9e074fb34e564f39@mail.gmail.com><ea3bd9560809052129h261240bfxa1d4669fa9c5777b@mail.gmail.com><e2f96c1b0809052226i5432eaf6naf24ae68e79fa26a@mail.gmail.com><ea3bd9560809060023w4f627cbbqc022ee1e2d59abe0@mail.gmail.com><BAY140-W1330E9539CFFB04BE6833BE45B0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BAY140-W1330E9539CFFB04BE6833BE45B0@phx.gbl>


Nelda,
Those are the only 2 STR's changed when I joined Ancestry's website.
Instead of testing with them, I
provided my 67-STR sequence from FTDNA. There was a comment on the panel
that stated DYS442's
value would be increased by 5 and H4's by 11.

Charlie Hollenbeck


On 9/6/08, Nelda Percival <> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
> I don't know where to find what markers need conversion when comparing
> ancestrydna to FTDNA?
>
> Do you know what markers? and by how many? The only two that seem far off
> are:
>
> DYS442
> H4
>
> thank you Nelda L. PercivalCopy Right information:
> http://www.pddoc.com/copyright/copyright_facts.htm
> ********************************************
> My websites
> http://freepages.folklore.rootsweb.com/~bonsteinandgilpin/
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message
>


This thread: