GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-09 > 1221003950
From: charles <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] What shall R1b1c call themselves now?
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:45:50 -0400
References: <75740.73996.qm@web86608.mail.ird.yahoo.com><EEEFFC8B-308E-4BD2-9E81-9D09E24FFB3C@vizachero.com>
In-Reply-To: <EEEFFC8B-308E-4BD2-9E81-9D09E24FFB3C@vizachero.com>
You state that like it is already decided and settled. Preferred by whom.
Obviously you prefer the spartan symbology. Others prefer a composite in between
the complete but growing longer alphanumeric string and the suggested new
spartan symbology of R-L2, i.e, using R1b-L2 or R1b(L2).
CK
Vincent Vizachero wrote:
> The preferred method is a single letter followed by the most
> downstream SNP. R-M269, R-M73, R-P312, etc. The main goal with this
> method is continuity, and using just the single letter major clade is
> the best insurance for this.
>
> VV
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] What shall R1b1c call themselves now? by charles <> |