GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2008-10 > 1224816810


From: John German <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] FTDNA moves to new haplotree,new SNPs added to Deep Clades
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:53:30 -0400
References: <BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPCEFAFMAA.scorpion@netconnect.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <BFECJOAEEPCFBFFLLBGPCEFAFMAA.scorpion@netconnect.com.au>


I believe its been mentioned before that while we need a shorthand way
to indicate our SNP results, the "-" is confusing because it also looks
like a minus sign. Using R(P312) was criticized although I don't recall
why. How about R:P312 or R+P312 or R>P312 ?

Dennis Wright wrote:

>Nelda wrote:-
>
>Boy is this confusing...
>LOL... :>) got a question... R-P312/S116 is this a negitive or positive..
>
>************************************************************************
>You quote the last derived or +ve so R-S116 means I have tested +ve, derived at that SNP.
>If ALL SNPs below that S116 have tested ancestral or -ve for me, then I can say I am R-S116*
>
>
>


This thread: